繁体中文

JPT MOPA M7 100W lens recommendation

30
1
查看翻譯
4 天前
I am planning to order a fiber laser marking/engraving machine. Almost done. It will be MOPA M7 100 W E2 source from JPT. Now the lenses: quartz material and i decided to take 4 lenses. My current pick is F100, F210, F290 and F420. What you think about this set? I’m buying this laser for general experiments, playing around in home workshop, marking my tools, doing some deep engraving, occasional metal cutting and who knows what else? That is why i’m thinking about the shortest possible lens for 60x60 mm are and the biggest one for 300x300 mm area, plus some lenses in between. Is it sensible approach? Thanks for any inputs.
C
    • I have a 300x300mm FL420, a 175x175mm FL254, and a 70x70mm FL100. That set seems like a decent spread for me (although the middle one could go a bit either way – it just came with the machine as a default).
      
      The FL100 is plenty tight to pack a punch on small parts (e.g. coin blanks).
      
      The FL420 is plenty wide to handle the big stuff like square-foot tiles, and with enough depth of focus to handle the compound curves of Contigo travel mugs in a rotary.
      
      Most of the time, however, I’m just using the FL254, as it’s in the goldilocks zone. It’s got enough depth of field to play with natural items like rocks. It’s got enough usable area to handle most things I tend to work on. And it’s tight enough to pack a decent punch.
      
      If you’re doing serial production of large numbers, having the smallest lens that covers your use case may be able to shave enough time off each job to add up over many runs. For general experimentation, on the other hand, having one less lens makes me happy. If I’m doing something that needs my short punchy lens or my wide reachy lens, I go for the appropriate lens. For everything else, I have one less variable to deal with: power, speed, interval, frequency, pulse length, but not which lens to choose.
        查看翻譯
        回複
      收藏
      舉報